One of the things that has gotten a lot of press lately is how Evangelical leaders who are a part of Trump’s informal faith advisory council have stuck with their man, even after Trump’s Charlottesville fiasco.

Even after Trump wavered on his condemnation of white supremacy in his recent comments on Charlottesville — indicting “both sides,” as though the left shared just as much blame as neo-NAZI’s — evangelical leaders continue to stand by Trump. Even after a wave of prominent CEOs defected from one of Trump’s advisory groups and even after every last soul resigned from the President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities, prominent evangelical leaders continue to ring out their support, which has come most ardently (and most infamously) from Jerry Falwell, Jr. who took to Twitter to praise Trump in the immediate aftermath of Trump’s Charlottesville speech.

The most obvious question: Why?

Given how at-odds Trump is with the basic tenants of morality and spirituality as taught by Jesus, how can evangelicals remain so steadfast in their support for Trump?

Trump isn’t merely a political means to an end, he’s one of them

And so articles buzz as they circulate social media, all asking variants of the same question: When will evangelical leaders dump Trump?

The answer: never

Falwell and TrumpWhy will Evangelicals stick by their guy? It’s kind of simple: Trump and Evangelicals all pretty much believe the same things, at least so far as their politics are concerned. Trump isn’t merely a political means to an end, he’s one of them.

The answer is simple but that doesn’t mean that I haven’t been mystified by it all, nor does it mean that I haven’t been traumatized by the spiritual bankruptcy of the movement of Evangelicalism, the place of my own spiritual birth and early spiritual development. I spent nearly the first 30 years of my life in evangelical circles, but even I was taken back by exit polls that showed 80% of evangelicals voted Trump.

 

By their fruits you will know them

I shouldn’t have been, but I suppose there was something deep inside of me that remained optimistic, something that wanted to believe that evangelicals would have enough connection with the founder of their faith so as to avoid making a deal with the devil, but the reality is that the evangelical movement has never really been all that into following the life and teachings of Jesus.

As a movement, Evangelicals are far more concerned about Roe v. Wade, more worried about being persecuted for their faith, more stressed that they are losing the “culture wars,” more afraid of undocumented immigrants, and more concerned about preserving capitalism. So when a billionaire, pussy grabbing Playboy comes along who talks tough on all of these issues, it’s a no-brainer because despite how at-odds Trump is with the life and teachings of Jesus, he’s got a lot in common with evangelicals.

Another complication, for me, is that I remember Monica Lewinsky

This critique doesn’t apply to all Evangelicals, of course, but to the direction of the movement. I have friends and family that are evangelical and who have broken the mold, but they remain minorities within the movement, exceptions that prove the rule. And they also often feel defensive, which is how I felt in my final years as an Evangelical.

There is something fairly unique to Evangelical Christianity here in America: there’s an extreme lack of political diversity. Growing up Evangelical, there was always a sense that if you don’t hold to the conservative party line, then you need to explain yourself. Conservative politics, were, essentially, God’s politics. Those who differed were viewed with suspicion. For example, if you are an Evangelical with a nuanced view on abortion, you’ll be viewed suspiciously, as if you may be a baby-killing liberal.

You get more political diversity within other church movements. If you are a Roman Catholic, you get a little political breathing room, and Roman Catholics don’t vote straight Red Republican, like Evangelicals. This made it complicated for those of us who grew up Evangelical.

 

Clinton and Lewinsky

 

Another complication to this whole discussion, for me, is that I remember Monica Lewinsky. I remember the blue dress. I was an impressionable teenager when the original Jerry Falwell and other Evangelical leaders railed against Bill Clinton. Leaders needed to be above reproach, a model of morality. Clinton, they said, represented the degeneration of the culture, which was bound to happen, it was implied, because liberals are themselves a degenerate lot.

For me, there’s still a good bit of pain in watching this alliance with Trump

 

I took this all to heart. I was a very earnest young believer, back in those days. Now these same leaders and their kin have embraced Trump, and Trump the Playboy is miles ahead of Bill Clinton in his sexual debauchery. Clinton just had a few blow jobs and then apologized (when he realized he couldn’t cover it up). Trump has been a brazen adulterer, breaking just about any sexual commandment that God’s ever been able to dream up.

But Trump is one of them, and that’s the difference. 

The verse that comes to my mind is “by their fruits you will know them.” But maybe a Game of Thrones approach is more to the point —- by their allies you will know them. It’s deeper than an alliance, though. Evangelicals really like Trump. I suppose this is what makes it all the harder to watch, as a former believer. It’s never seems to get easy, to watch the movement that gave birth to your most sincere spiritual aspirations circle the wagon for Team Trump, and to do so with so few reservations, except a token comment about how Trump “has made mistakes” or how his temperament is a bit abrasive.

I’ve longed since moved on, from the religious movement of Evangelicalism, but there’s still a good bit of pain in watching this alliance with Trump continue to work itself out. It feels like my spiritual birthright was sold, and sold cheap, and that’s a shitty feeling to have.

As we learned in Sunday School, Esau sold his birthright — but at least he fed himself when he was starving. He was desperate, so you can hardly blame the dude. Evangelicals, I suppose, are desperate too, but it’s hard to tell what they are fighting for, anymore. It certainly isn’t for anything Jesus taught or for anything that Jesus lived for.

Source: When will evangelical leaders dump Trump?

8 thoughts on “When will evangelical leaders dump Trump?

  1. How is it that “evangelical” seems to refer exclusively to white people? A significant proportion of American black people are evangelical Christians (Baptist, AME, holiness churches, etc.), but in the election they were as strong for Clinton as the white evangelicals were for Trump.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Also….Exit polls in 2016 showed that roughly 80% of evangelicals voted Trump. Is there a correlation with the fact that nearly 80% of evangelicals are white? Another fair question.

      Like

  2. That Pew graph also includes the category “historically black Protestant,” which are pretty solidly evangelical in belief. From this harticle:

    While less than four in 10 (38 percent) Americans overall report attending religious services weekly or more often, 58 percent of white evangelical Protestants and 55 percent of black Protestants attend church at least weekly. White evangelical Protestants and black Protestants also share a particularly literal approach to the Bible. Among the general public, approximately one-third (35 percent) believe the Bible is the literal word of God, but about six in 10 white evangelical Protestants (61 percent) and black Protestants (57 percent) hold a literal view of the Bible. These two groups also share a belief in a personal God, an emphasis on individual salvation, and religious architecture that emphasizes the centrality of the pulpit over the altar.

    I.e., most historically black Protestant churches are evangelical in belief and practice. It seems that the whites have appropriated the term “evangelical” for themselves, segregating the evangelical black churches into a separate but unequal category.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. John: “It seems that the whites have appropriated the term “evangelical” for themselves, segregating the evangelical black churches into a separate but unequal category.”

      And this is almost certainly due to political differences, I’d reckon.

      Like

    2. Also…..It is possible that the separation is mutual? Maybe African-Americans who sympathize with evangelical doctrine want nothing to do with mixing conservative politics in with their religion, and hence they distance themselves from the “evangelical” label.

      Like

  3. Racial segregation in the church began during slave days and continued after emancipation, even if the beliefs of white and black churches were very similar. So the political differences between evangelical white Protestants and black Protestants are almost certainly due to race and not to religious belief. It’s clear that most black churchgoers combine political liberalism with Bible-believing Christian faith in ways that most white evangelicals resist.

    Liked by 1 person

Share your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s